Discover what really works in digital marketing in a free 15 minute call. If you want better rankings in Google, meaningful social media results and to break the pattern of failed campaigns, talk to John McDougall today. John has helped hundreds of businesses of all sizes grow their web presence and authority since 1995. Become … Schedule Free Call
3 Steps to Discover Content Gaps with MarketMuse

John McDougall: Welcome to Authority Marketing Roadmap. I’m John McDougall, CEO of McDougall Interactive. Today I’m speaking with Aki Balogh, co‑founder of MarketMuse, a content intelligence platform that identifies content gaps on your website. Welcome Aki.
Aki Balogh: Great to be back.
John: Absolutely. We just had a nice chat about topical authority and now we’re going to have a little bit of a how‑to‑use MarketMuse, your software. What’s the first step?
How to Use MarketMuse
Aki: It’s very easy, it’s a three step process. First step, once you’ve gone in the tool, first step is to crawl your domain. You put in a domain, you put in your domain or your client’s domain, and you click the “crawl” button.
We actually go, and our engine just crawls all of the pages on your site. This does take some time. If you have a small site, it might take a couple of minutes. If you have a large site, it could take a couple of hours. If you have a very large site, it could take over a day.
We email you when it’s done. We need to do that so that’s a foundational step. Basically you put in your domain, you click crawl, and then you get out of the application or you do something else.
John: Go have a sandwich. [laughs]
Aki: Have a sandwich. [laughs] Depending how long it takes you to eat the sandwich compared to your site.
John: Nice.
Aki: Basically we email you when it’s done and say, “OK, your results are ready.” Then when it’s ready the fun starts, because then you go back into the tool and then you get to step two. Step two is you put in one keyword that you want to rank for, that you want to be known for, and you click “analyze”, and the tool will give you your content gaps.
It’ll bring up fifty what we call “related keywords”. Keywords that exist in the same context as the keyword you want to rank for. And because we’ve crawled your page we also tell you the frequency of how often those related keywords come up on your page.
We color it — anything that you’ve mentioned a lot will be in green and everything you have not mentioned a lot will be in red. It’s really those red that you probably want to go after because those are your topical gaps.
Content Gaps
John: Does that show you anything to do with siloing, does it somehow break out “do you have lots of pages on that topic?” Does it give you your site map and show you the keywords?
Aki: The tool that I’m sort of walking you through now is called Site Audit and that doesn’t audit on a domain level. That just summarizes all of your keywords across your entire domain. That specific tool does not give you a breakout but we have other tools that give you a page level breakout.
Site Audit and that domain authority type analysis is really useful for your content planning because you can look at your domain overall and say, “OK, here’s a keyword that’s very important to our business and, look, we’ve got some gaps.”
John: Those are red?
Aki: Those are red, right. You can change the threshold and get into it, you can change the threshold for what’s green and what’s red but we try to estimate that threshold based on just how many pages you have on your site.
We try to make it really easy for you. Anything that comes out as a red is your best starting point. Then that gets you to step three. OK, you’ve got a couple things that are red, you probably will because most sites — even just as an aside, we did an analysis of GNC.com.
It’s obviously great e‑commerce site and they have over 250,000 pages and when you look at GNC.com, the first thing that comes up, the first category, is sports nutrition.
We did an analysis of sports nutrition and we found that they’re doing really great for a lot of those sports nutrition related keywords, except sports drinks. They’ve only mentioned sports drinks a couple hundred times, whereas most other keywords they’ve mentioned five, six, seven, eight thousand times.
John: Wow.
Prioritizing Content Gaps
Aki: There’s just a gap. The reason that this gap is there is just they’ve never had a tool that let them think about the context of sports nutrition and what exists in that context. Every site we’ve seen so far, even really great sites, has at least one or a couple gaps. Back to the third step, how do you prioritize those gaps? You’re going to have gaps, you’re going to have several.
How do you prioritize? We give you a couple of data points around that. One, we just give the volume. What’s the monthly search volume for that related keyword? If you have two keywords and one of them has a lot more volume then the other one, you can prioritize that. By the way, there’s human judgment here so that gap might not be part of your differentiation.
It just might not be important to you. You might not want to win in that specific aspect. If you don’t want to, you obviously don’t have to. You can de‑prioritize it. We also give you another data point which is called attractiveness. Attractiveness is basically a measure of how much relevant traffic that keyword can drive for you.
It’s a function of relevance and keyword traffic. Keyword traffic, for technical folks, is a function of volume, CPC, and competition from your pay‑per‑click campaign.
By sorting on attractiveness and looking at the gaps, you actually are able to say, “OK, this keyword has a certain amount of volume but also paid advertisers are willing to pay a lot of money for it so it’s probably very valuable. That’s the gap we should plug first.
John: You can prioritize those items that are in red that also have a high attractiveness score?
Aki: Yes. You want to — depending on what your strategy is — you’ll want to look at either volume or attractiveness. That’s how you then sort your list — and again, it really is human judgment.
Sometimes we’ve talked to companies and we say, “Well you know that such and such is a gap.” They say, “Oh yeah, we know that, but our competition is all over that. That’s not really a big part of what our product does”, and so on. You can refine that.
Everything that I’ve just talked about is our Site Audit tool, which would be the first tool when you join and you land in Site Audit. There’s a separate, competitive audit tool that you can also plug in your competitor URL and then compare what are you strong in versus your competitors and identify what your competitors are weak in and helps that conversation along. It’s basically the same tool with some additional competitors.
John: Yeah I was going to say, it sounds like it’s doing the same thing.
Aki: Same flow, yup.
John: It’s the same tool basically, but does it let you store those as “here’s my competitor” and now when I come back I can re‑look at it or re‑crawl it?
Aki: Yes, absolutely.
John: You can store it?
Aki: Absolutely. This is all stored so you can access it later and come back and see where you are. It’s one of those things where you might only use it — these tools — you might only use this every couple of weeks, potentially. You might use it once a month. Just to see what the next highest impact content that you should create is.
The fact that you’re using an intelligent…you’re using a data‑driven, quantitative process to get to your content gaps and prioritize the most important.
The fact that you’re using data is great because that means when you send it off to your content creation team or when you sit down and write your blog post, you’re spending that time wisely.
MarketMuse as an SEO Website Redesign Tool
John: One final thought is that we have a lot of people come to us to consider us for either building their website or SEO. We usually don’t do just a website, we always bake SEO into it. Sometimes people will come and they’ll — like a health care company recently came to us and they’re about to rebuild their website. They’re going to go build the website and maybe come back to us later for SEO.
If they don’t bring SEO into the equation when they’re rebuilding their website, the navigation might not be very scalable or it might have to be band-aided later if they later discover content gaps. As a web design, when companies are doing a website redesign, I’d recommend that they use your tool.
Aki: Absolutely. We found that the companies that get the most value out of this process are the companies that are seriously committed to becoming an authority on something.
They’re probably already doing content marketing or they’re thinking of a content marketing strategy. Then within that, they’re very committed to being known on the web for being an authority at something or a set of topics because when you’re starting out if you only have a couple of pieces of content you don’t have a whole lot. There’s a lot of green field.
John: Like sports drinks, you said. If GNC isn’t ranking well for that, you can tell them why. Like, “Hey, you really need to cover this topic better.”
Aki: Absolutely. They’re putting a lot of money and a lot of effort into being the authority on sports nutrition and they have this, in hindsight, relatively obvious gap. Of course, it’s only obvious once you know to look for it.
You’ll get the most value out of this tool if you’re seriously committed to owning a niche. That niche could be relatively — you don’t have to own “sports nutrition” if you’re a small, medium business.
You won’t have those resources, but you can find some specific niche that you can truly own. If you own 80 percent of that niche, if you’re the voice of authority on that niche, you get a lot of great business out of that and it’s entirely doable within a low to moderate budget even.
John: Absolutely. Well thanks for the thoughts today and for the second podcast, that’s great. This has been workingdemosite.com/authority podcast with Aki Balogh of MarketMuse. For more information, check out marketmuse.com and workingdemosite.com/authority and subscribe to our podcast on iTunes.
I’m John McDougall. See you next time on the Authority Marketing Roadmap.
How To Become a Topical Authority and Skyrocket Your Website Traffic (with Aki Balogh of MarketMuse)
John McDougall: Welcome to Authority Marketing Road Map. I’m John McDougall, CEO of McDougall Interactive. Today, I’m speaking with Aki Balogh, co‑founder of MarketMuse, a content intelligence platform that identifies gaps of content on your website. Welcome Aki!
Aki Balogh: Thanks for having me again.
What does it mean to be a topical authority?
John: Absolutely. Today, we’re going to be talking about topical authority. What does it mean to be a topical authority?
Aki: In terms of web marketing, I’m going to take a half step back and talk about content marketing. What’s changed over the last couple of years is when you market your business, you want to put out a lot of information to help educate your customer, to draw people in who would be interested in your product. Having that at the “top of the funnel,” really gets you a lot of better traffic, higher quality leads, and so on.
That’s great. To put out content is important. You create content. You disseminate it. You promote it on social media, et cetera. There’s so much about how to do that, but what people forget is, “Well, why do I want to do that anyway?”
Why do your customers come to you? It’s because you’re the expert in your business. Whatever you’re providing, whether it’s the products or services, they’re coming to you because they trust that you have that knowledge and that experience to solve their problem much better than they would do on their own.
That’s where authority and topical authority comes in. It’s the manifestation of being really good at something, being the expert at something. The manifestation of that on the web. Being a topical authority in a web marketing context means that you are the go‑to person for questions on a specific topic or set of topics.
Gaining Trust with Topical Authority
John: It’s important that you cover topics completely so that you gain their trust, essentially?
Aki: Exactly. It’s about trust, and also just being helpful to them. If they have a question on “X”, you’re the go‑to person for “X”. Of course, there’s an additional layer that “Well, what if they have a question on something slightly related to X but not exactly?”
You just want to be really helpful to the people who would actually be buyers of your products or services, whether you’re trying to convert them to become a paying customer, or whether you just want to answer their questions because you’re the expert on the field, and why not help people out and give them some useful information?
John: It’s a lot different from old school advertising and marketing that were more “salesy.” Brochures and TV ads are certainly fun and could be interesting, but the days of content marketing have sort of deepened marketing a bit.
Topical Authority and Google Rankings
How important is being a topical authority to Google specifically?
Aki: It’s very important. When you think of Google as a search engine, and any really great search engine, their guiding principle is, when somebody types in a query and you put in a keyword and you search on it, what are the absolute best pages on the Internet that you want to show to satisfy that intent of that search?
Any successful search engine, or really any sort of information retrieval system, would want to give you — the number one result would be the most relevant, the highest, most authoritative, the absolute best source of information as an answer to that question.
The second rank would be the second best and so on and so forth. Google has been doing this since their founding. This is the reason that people use Google, because when — or the majority uses Google — they’re really good at when you ask them a question, they respond with answers that are relevant and authoritative.
Topical authority — adding that word “topical” just adds an additional element to that and that is the topics that are covered in that post. Whoever wrote that post is an expert on that topic. People have different definitions for…
Right now, there’s a lot of different words floating around to describe what’s effectively the same thing. You have keywords, and marketers are familiar with keywords. Now, you have topic. What’s the topic? And there’s entity, which is “things not strings”.
It is effectively the same thing. It’s just different words for a domain or a subset of a domain. What is something specific? When you type in a question into Google, Google pulls out what’s the intent, what’s the meaning of what you’re trying to ask and trying to match up the meaning of your question with the meaning of all the sites that they’ve indexed.
To get back to the original question, being a topical authority is really about, you want to be the best position to answer that type of question. You do that by covering that specific question and also the related, the sub‑parts, of that question, and things related to the question, and things that exist in that same context. You cover that comprehensively. If you do that, you’ll become the topical authority.
We can all think of companies that we know and we listen to for advice about certain types of problems. Sometimes they’re major brands, and sometimes they are not major brands. Maybe it’s just a site that you really like going to on the Web, that’s your go‑to site. They’re not a national brand, but they just have really great answers for certain types of questions. That’s a topical authority.
John: It can be a little bit of David and Goliath. If there’s a big brand that’s really known for that topic, but they’re not known in a Google sense, they haven’t actually done that content marketing work. They may be known off‑line, but they may have a harder time online.
Aki: Absolutely. That’s the great opportunity with Web marketing today that exists for small and medium businesses, is they can actually win that fight. That’s a fight they can win.
You, as the small, medium business especially, you don’t have, necessarily, multimillion dollar budgets. You can’t push out all these messages on TV and wherever. Also search ads, and so on. You don’t have that to spend.
You can actually be the expert on something and make it known that you’re the expert on something, and answer a lot of people’s questions really well. If you do that, then organic search, Google search, will be one channel that’ll perform really well for you. You’ll actually get a lot of great business through that, just by building it.
The best thing about that, too, by the way, most of this is evergreen content. Of course, you have to keep current and so on. You do it once, you do it really well once, and it’s just going to produce for you for a very long time.
John: Like Wikipedia, they might come up maybe even too much in search sometimes, but they have all these good, solid answers, within reason anyway. They just keep coming up over and over. It’s kind of evergreen. People are looking for descriptions of the background of a topic, the introduction to the topic, the meat of the topic, the who, what, why, when, where.
How has it changed over the years? Back when I was doing SEO in the ’90s, it was so easy. Really, it was so much easier. We would literally get ahold of a website where somebody, maybe they didn’t have a page for every one of their services.
We would go so far as to say, “Hey, you know what, you’ve got a services page, but you don’t have a page for your service. Maybe we’ll make a few pages.” We’d put keywords on each of those pages that were very specific to that page.
Even that little bit of effort went so far, we would skyrocket and people would love us. It was so easy. Now, everybody’s got a page for every service. Most people who are doing search would know that.
They’ve gone in and attacked it with keywords on every page. They’re saying, “Why am I not ranking anymore? I’ve got my keywords stuffed into my title tag and my heading and throughout my page.” How have things changed from those days in terms of Google algorithms?
Aki: Absolutely. The way that you framed it, John, I would say there have been two major shifts. Of course, there have been many, but the two major shifts from what you just said.
One, Web marketing used to be just completely green field. If you did it, you’d get somewhere. Now, it is more competitive.
But by the same token, just having keywords, that specific technique, I would argue old SEO, the old way of doing SEO, where you were looking at the form of the content, and did you have this keyword in your H1 tag and what not — that type of tactic, that doesn’t work anymore. That’s not effective.
John: It doesn’t work on it’s own. It’s still a prerequisite. You need some of that stuff, but you can’t just rely on that.
Aki: Yeah, absolutely. Well said. It’s just foundational. What is the wild west is content marketing, where it’s really just are you putting informative, interesting content on the Web, which is sort of where it should have been in the beginning to start with. With search and content creation was always about, “Hey, if you have a question, here’s an answer.”
Then, there have been a lot of different ways that folks have gamed it or so on. That’s really where Google is coming around now, is it’s really bringing it back to what they wanted to do in the beginning, which is giving the most authoritative people the greatest voice, and that part is surprising.
The companies we’ve looked at, and the sites we’ve looked at, some sites have been doing this for a long time. Some sites have been creating informative content from the early days. They didn’t call it content marketing or inbound marketing, but they were just doing it because it just seemed like the right thing to do.
Other companies are just coming around to it now and learning about it. Then as you pointed out, some brands have done this and some brands have never done this. It’s because of that, it is the Wild West, that there are many niches that you can actually own. If you get in there and you create a lot of great content on it now, you’re actually going to be able to position yourself and really own that niche and own a lot of the traffic that goes there.
John: Just to give our listeners a little super quick background, there had been many Google algorithms, but a couple of quick ones to just bring into context here. Google Penguin looked at if there were too many sketchy backlinks done by SEO companies, for example.
Your ranks would go down, that discoverability for Google to figure out who the authorities are by backlinks got all screwed up when we, as SEOs, were able to do some crappy article links and your ranks would go up. Thankfully, it’s good that Google got smarter on that topic.
Then with Google Panda, with creating original unique value content, not just, “OK, we need to cover this topic. Let’s go scrape a bunch of articles and put it together,” Google Panda has made it so that you really have to develop legitimate content.
Google Panda and Google Penguin set the stage, but now it’s evolving into this whole new stratosphere. Maybe you could go briefly into Google Hummingbird and semantic search a bit.
Aki: I’d be absolutely happy to, and just to your last point, John, David Amerland, who wrote several books on semantic SEO at Google, he’s pointed out that the core mission of Google, that the success criteria, the pillars, that will make you successful on Google come down to four key concepts ‑‑ authorship, content, influence, and trust. If you’re creating great content, high‑quality content, and you have content in a site that your users trust, and you have influence in the industry, that’s really going to get you there.
Whether it’s Panda or Penguin or Hummingbird, those are implementations of how Google can assess your site better on these four elements, really. With that, as you’ve pointed out, Google — I’m sorry, Panda and Penguin — were really ways that Google prevented folks from gaming the system, whether knowingly or just whoever they were working with was gaming the system, the agency they were working with might have been gaming the system.
John: Absolutely.
Aki: They weren’t aware of it, but anyway, it reduced ways that people would abuse the system.
Hummingbird is interesting because it’s different. It takes the conversation forward and this is where, as you point out, this term “semantic SEO”, this is where semantic SEO comes in. Semantic SEO is really just also the Wild West there. Content marketing to some extent is Wild West. You see companies that are great at it and companies that are not.
Semantic SEO is within that, even more advanced. The way to think about it is, going back to your earlier example, John, if you had a keyword. Let’s say you had your primary keyword, right? You have a list of ten primary keywords that you want to rank for in search, and so you take your primary keyword and you’d write content about that keyword, and it was very specific. That content was very specific to that keyword.
What Semantic SEO does is a part of Hummingbird where Hummingbird is looking at your content, and it’s reading not just the specific primary keyword, but it’s also looking at the related keyword’s topics. The topics that you’re covering in that post and across your site, and the topics that are covered in the sites that link to you and so on and so forth. It’s doing all of this topic modeling, actually. That’s where Hummingbird really extends it.
Without drowning in detail, I would say where semantic SEO meshes up with content marketing, is it’s this idea of topical authority. It’s semantic SEO, and measuring the meaning of words is basically semantics. Its measuring the meaning of words makes Google better at rating whether you’re an authority on that topic, and that’s where it ties in.
One, you’re trying to write content. Two, you’re trying to write content that’s specialized, that content that addresses problems that are relevant in that domain and that show off your domain expertise. Semantic SEO is going to help you do that, because you don’t just have to write about this one keyword, and you pound that to death, but you just write naturally about topics that are important within that area of expertise.
All of that is called “high‑quality content.” Now with Hummingbird, there’s a real impetus to pay attention to it because it’s factoring into your rankings on Google. As we all know, a couple of jumps in ranking if you go from 10 to five or something like that, you’re going to see a lot more organic traffic as a result.
John: Ultimately, Google’s trying to understand the context, the meaning of the words as opposed to making you filter through the results. I was reading something over the weekend. I don’t know if it was “Search Engine Land” or somewhere, or maybe “Search Engine Journal.” They were talking and they had an example about buying a lemon. “How to Avoid Buying a Lemon” was the example.
If you’re Google, if you’re the Wizard of Oz behind Google, the search, the algorithm, saying, “Well, what do they mean ‘How to Avoid Buying a Lemon?'” Do they mean the citrus fruit, or do they mean a car? How does a search engine that’s not a person know the difference? What you’re saying is, “You can give context to Google. If you cover the topics completely it becomes a lot more obvious.”
Aki: Absolutely, I would say for us at least the hardest problem in semantic analytics has been disambiguation. When one word or one phrase means multiple things, that’s disambiguation. That’s a tricky one.
As you point out, lemon is slang for a low‑quality car or vehicle. That’s just disambiguation. There’s only so much you can do about that, because when you’re given a query like that, buying a lemon, there’s really only so much you can do. You can look at external information, and look at, well, what is more likely, or look at the user’s history, and so on.
Oftentimes, the user can actually disambiguate for you. You might not want to rank for “buying a lemon,” because it’s not going to be your primary keyword, necessarily. If you just write about cars, how to make sure that your used car that you purchase is, how to be successful as a used car purchaser, or whatever. That’s going to circumvent a lot of that issue.
It just comes back to, you take your list of 10 primary keywords you’re starting out with, and you just write naturally about them. You write naturally, in English, just natural English, natural language, around those keywords. You mention those keywords, but you also mention other things that you would just expect to read if you were reading an article on this. The search engine will handle some of those issues for you.
MarketMuse and Topical Authority
John: How does MarketMuse, your software, help you with that?
Aki: Honestly, all we do is we make this process more efficient and more effective. The problem that we are working on solving or remediating, is when you are looking to write content naturally, you’re looking to write high‑quality content, you’re looking to write about topics and keywords that exist in that context. How are you actually going to do that tactically?
You take your 10 primary keywords, you’ve picked the first one, and you say, “OK, what do I write about that’s relevant to this keyword?” You might brainstorm, you might start by doing some brainstorming, you might look it up on Wikipedia, you might research what you’re competitors have written about. If you’re an organization or you’re selling a product that’s non‑intuitive, you might talk to a product manager to do some brainstorming.
You’re just doing all this thinking around it, which is great, and you should do that. What we do, is we just make that process a little bit more effective. We take ranking, high‑quality content for that topic, and we model it.
We say, “OK, you’re looking to rank for this keyword, here’s the constellation of topics.” We call them “related keywords”. Keywords that relate to your primary keyword. These are some of the keywords that you’ll want to think about writing content about. If you want to be the absolute best site for, the authority, topical authority, for X, here are 50 other things you should probably mention.
Some of them you might agree with, and some of them you might not agree with, because maybe they don’t fit in your differentiation. Because we’re doing analytics, we’re downloading the best content on the Web, and we’re comparing your content against it, you probably get some really great ideas from there, and you’ll probably find something that you would have otherwise missed. That’s what our dashboard does for you, is it just shows you the gaps.
Then you can take that and write some content to fill those gaps. We’re not trying to replace your judgment as a human. We’re trying to supplement it with some machine intelligence that tells you, “Hey, did you think about this, what about that, what about that?” Nine out of ten, or maybe ten out of ten cases, will surface at least a couple of topics that you might have just forgotten about. When you see it, you’re like, “Oh my, we really need to write about that, too. That’s highly relevant.”
John: You take your competitor, ranking URLs. If you have some keywords you want to rank for, you search for those in Google, you see some competitors that are really ranking well. Not just the competitors that you think are important, which is obviously good, but you really have to look at what’s in your way in Google.
You can’t just look at what you think are your local competitors. Whoever’s right up there at the top of Google, they are probably going to have good back‑links, good content. You basically plug those URLs into your tool, that’s how you uncover the gaps?
Aki: It’s actually much simpler. Literally, it’s just a two‑step process. You go to the website, you join or you start a free trial there.
First you put in your website, and then we crawl it. We need to crawl your site in order to get a sense of what your content is like. Actually, we download your content. We do that first, and that process can take anywhere from a minute to 30 minutes or an hour, or if you have a very large site, a couple hours. We email you when that’s done.
When that’s done, what you do is you put in a primary keyword. We’ll just go and we’ll download the top content for that keyword. Whether it’s competitors, or Wikipedia, or whatever else, wherever else that information may be, we’ll pull that in and then we’ll pull out the most relevant topics within that.
That’s all. You only put in your URL. We have a separate tool that does a competitive audit. You can put in your competitor URLs and compare against them, but you don’t even have to do that. You just put in your URL, you put in a keyword that is very important to you, and then you click the button, and 30 seconds later you’ve got some ideas.
You can really explore it. This is sort of a more advanced use case. Once you have a starting point, you can actually refine it. You can remove keywords that exist in different contexts. If it’s not contextually related, you can remove it. You can dig deeper, and so on. You can do this discovery process and really refine what topics you’re focused on.
That also gets to your differentiation. You can really make your differentiation felt by doing this analysis and thinking through what you’re writing content about. Then when you sit down to write your blog post, or you go to your agency or your team who does content creation, you’re not just saying generic things like, “Oh, I want to post on this primary keyword,” you’re saying, “OK, we need to own this keyword X, and here are some things that we need to be really good at. We need to own this subtopic of X, but not this meaning, or not that meaning,” and so on.
You can do all of that discovery through our tool. You could do it without our tool, of course, but it would take hours for each keyword, potentially. With our tool, it just makes that process much faster.
John: That’s really great. I’m excited to use your tool more. Shortly, we’ll be doing a how‑to podcast with you. We’ll leave it at that for this one. That was some good initial tips to think about your content gaps. You can use MarketMuse at marketmuse.com.
Aki: That’s right.
John: We’ll be back shortly with another podcast about how to use MarketMuse. Thanks, Aki.
3 tips for instant influencer marketing
They say the rich get richer and that holds true in both influencer and authority marketing. It’s easier to influence the media and powerful influencers if you have a little bit of respect and visibility yourself.
Influencer marketing is essentially the art of building relationships with people that have influence over potential buyers. This can range from customers with large social followings, industry knowledge and relationships, to niche experts and journalists.
Authority Marketing is the systematic process of building up your trust and recognition as a deeply knowledgeable expert. However, without being connected to the thought leaders and influencers in your topical area, you won’t be seen as much of an authority.
These three tips can help you get connected quickly to the influential people in your industry.
1. Podcasting
Podcasting with influencers creates an instant relationship. They almost never turn down an interview, if you have a decent blog where it will go and are a visible expert yourself. Once you interview them and post the podcast on your site with the transcript, they will retweet it a very large percentage of the time. They will commonly link to it as well and share it in other ways.
I recently asked the National Law Review if they would like to do a podcast with me and it quickly got on their homepage and opened some great opportunities.
Co-created content has the power to make both parties look good and podcast interviews are not only simple to do but they play on people’s ego as well.
2. Principles of Influence
Dr. Robert Cialdini, is bestselling author of Influence: The Psychology of Influence and using his 6 principles is a great way to influence powerful people. These 3 should get you going.
- Liking is an often overlooked principle. If you are annoying the influencers rather than doing something nice for them, such as pointing out a broken page, image or link on their website, you are less likely to start a friendship. Reading their book and interviewing them about it is also an easy win.
- Authority is the next principle that should be an obvious one. Dr. Cialdini says people often feel that “If an expert says it, it must be true.” Influencers will be more likely influenced by those in positions of authority. This means that you have to make them aware of your proven expertise to get them to notice you.
- Social proof is a quick way to sway people in your direction. It helps to have a large following on social media, regular media mentions and visible connections with your industry specific peers. You will then be more likely to persuade high-level influencers, who know how to quickly review common credibility factors, before deciding whether you’re worthy of their time.
3. Blogger to blogger connections
Blogger to blogger connections are also a game changer. Writing blog posts that include quotes from influencers allows you to share that post with them and show that you are actively recognizing their thought leadership in your content. Commenting regularly on their blog posts in a helpful way and re-tweeting their content helps raise your visibility. If they respond to your comments on their blog, then you have already influenced them in a small way by starting a conversation.
Linking to influencers from your blog might also get you noticed, if they are checking referrals in their analytics program. That sometimes results in them linking back to you.
Conclusion
Google is certainly one of the most influential websites online. When training their website quality raters to give scores to web pages, they use the acronym “EAT.” It stands for expertise, authoritativeness and trustworthiness. The same acronym can be used to ensure your personal brand is up to snuff when attempting to influence powerful people.
Raising your level of influence is easier than you might think, if you formally position yourself as a visible and trustworthy expert. The reactions you will get from other influencers are often beyond their ability to control, as our instincts to follow experts is in our DNA.
Al Biedrzycki of HubSpot on Influencer Marketing
John Cass: Hello, I’m John Cass, SVP of Marketing at McDougall Interactive. Welcome to the Authority Marketing Roadmap podcast. Today’s podcast features Al Biedrzycki, who works in Partner Marketing at HubSpot. Today, we are going to talk about Influencer Marketing, and how you get the best results.
Welcome, Al.
Al Biedrzycki: Great to be here. Thanks for having me, John.
John: It’s great to have you. We’ve been talking for a while about the idea of Influencer Marketing and some ideas around that. Today’s discussion is going to be more of an open discussion where we’ve got questions, and we both attempt to answer them.
Let’s get started. First question we came up with was “What is Influencer Marketing”? What do you think of that question?
What is Influencer Marketing?
Al: We were talking back and forth about it at the Authority Marketing Seminar, way back in November. It was funny because I had started talking about some of the channel marketing stuff that I’ve done, and how it ties into some Influencer Marketing stuff that you’ve been working on.
What it is, to me, at least, is working with individuals, and call them “influencers,” who have a specific connection to an audience that you’re trying to tap into. For instance, a good example here is, say that a product that you want to sell to a group of individuals, there’s somebody, maybe a thought leader in the industry, who writes blog posts or creates content around that particular product or service that you’re offering.
This person would be considered an influencer. Influencer Marketing, in this case, is if you’re having ways to leverage them as a marketing channel. That’s how I see it. How about yourself, John?
John: It’s a term I’ve thought about for a number of years, although I’ve never actually…When I first started using it, I think I’ve used different terms over the years. I actually remember a big discussion back in 2005 between myself and Shel Holtz, who’s one of the principals of the podcast “For Immediate Release,” talking about the idea of blogger relations.
That particular term was a term that I think came up in the industry partly because the PR companies, PR industry, came up with that. They’re used to the idea of public relations, and blogger relations is more this idea of pitching people, where you pitch them an idea and say, “Hey, would you like to write about it?”
Whereas, the concept as I thought about it at the time was less about pitching people, although you could certainly use that term, and is really more about how you have an organic conversation with people, and through that process of back and forth, and talking about ideas, you actually start to influence people.
I eventually gave up on the idea that blogger relations meant that, because I think so many people went with the idea of blogger relations being more along the public relations concept, with pitching. It encompasses, really, or as time has gone on, influencer marketing has been kind of the other term.
Part of that is you’re going through this process. You are pitching people, but it’s also perhaps this process of how you build relationships with people through that organic process. Also, as you suggested, realizing that if you’re connecting with particular influencers, and they share your ideas and concepts, or even content, then you’re working within their networks as a result. It’s very much an organic process, still, as well.
Al: Totally, and for us here, speaking for HubSpot in general, we consider our influencers like thought leaders in the marketing industry, because we’re selling marketing software. To kind of piggyback on what you’re saying, it’s about us developing those relationships with those folks.
Either we pitch them, or we already have established relationships through somebody we know at the company. It’s building and developing those relationships, then figuring out the marketing communications and plans that you could use, through them. Leverage them to further your marketing message.
John: Yeah, and that makes sense, although one other thing that I would say is that if you’re in the process of pitching, although I think it’s certainly OK if you know somebody, you could send them a quick email and ask that. If you are pitching someone, I often think it’s better coming from the PR Department, rather than another influencer who is building a relationship with another influencer.
You’re pitching, so you’re asking for something to be done. If you have an easy, casual relationship, I think that’s sometimes pretty easy, but if it’s more of a straight pitch, then there actually is a good role for PR people, and PR companies, in that instance. What are your thoughts?
Al: Definitely. You keep bringing up the term PR a lot, and it’s like how PR has evolved, where Influencer Marketing is now. It’s almost a hybrid of PR and content marketing, when you think about it, because as content is becoming more streamlined on the Internet ‑‑ people can read it, digest it, produce it a lot faster.
PR has absorbed those qualities and figured out, “OK, how can we take content marketing and what it means for businesses, put a PR spin on it by connecting with these influencers, and making the two practices meet”, in a way. It’s almost like a crossroads where PR and content marketing meet, like Influencer Marketing in a way.
That’s how I’m visualizing and how I usually talk about it.
John: Yeah, I think you are absolutely right, Al. Crossroads is a good term there between several disciplines ‑‑ PR, journalism and so forth. What happens, essentially, those different disciplines provide different aspects of how you are successful in your Influencer Marketing efforts.
I’d say PR influenced things, I think journalism especially in ethics and the approach to things and also perhaps the discipline. Then SEO throws in some stuff which comes into marketing, really, in how you approach this whole idea of building connections that then have another influence on top.
If you build those relationships with people, that then results in link back to your website, that’s actually going to have an indirect effect because it may up your search engine rankings and therefore you’ll get additional sales as result.
That was one of the most interesting things that I found when I was doing the corporate blogging survey back in 2005, where I was talking to people that Macromedia and that sort of companies and learning that the product managers in those early days were getting direct sales results out of the indirect organic work that they were doing.
Al: That’s interesting.
John: Yeah, I think product managers were the first people. There’s another discipline that, partly because they’re evangelists, and they are also trying to figure out the model for how you actually do marketing. They were some of the first people to figure out how to get blogging and social media.
And in essence, what they were doing is Influencer Marketing. They may have been doing it with customers or their influencers, but especially in the early days, a lot of those companies were technology companies and their customers were on the Web. They were influencers and so those relationships had a huge effect for companies like IBM and Macromedia.
Role of Influencer Marketing
Al: The next question we have here, and I think that we sort of both answered it, John, that we talked about. What is the role of Influencer Marketing in your work? I can go first on this one and dive in. I got a pretty good answer to this one. [laughs]
John: Yeah, go ahead.
Al: You mentioned at the beginning of the podcast, I work with the HubSpot partner program, I do Partner Marketing. It’s almost like a micro version of Influencer Marketing that I leverage through our channels. There are a lot of partners in our communities, over 2,000 partner agencies work with HubSpot.
There are a lot of different campaigns that I run that tap into our partners, for instance. What sparked this idea in my head was when you mentioned product managers being evangelists for the products that they are trying to launch, trying to market and such.
We sometimes lean on our partners to help promote something that we are releasing. They’re our influencer community in a way, which is pretty interesting. We have a lot of different partners all across the world that have different resources and reach that we do.
It’s interesting that we tap into them to get their extent of reach on something that we’re releasing ourselves too. Because, they are reselling it, they obviously want to talk about it too, and they have a reach that we don’t. That’s how Influencer Marketing plays a role in what I do.
John: Yeah, it’s a really interesting case study for what you do and using Influencer Marketing and how it’s executed. For ourselves here at McDougall, I’d say principally, it’s one of two ways. If it’s for ourselves, we run a couple of podcasts, the Authority Marketing Roadmap for example, and we use the podcast as a way to reach out to influencers and have ongoing discussions about what’s going on in the industry.
That’s one of the ways that we build relationships with people.
We also have another blog called “The Legal Marketing Review,” where we’ve used that to ask a series of questions and build a survey. We are just about to launch an eBook on that.
Then for our clients, often we are just talking with the clients when we are doing podcasting with them. Increasingly, we are also looking into opportunities to…perhaps either us doing a podcast with the influencers in their market places or have the client perhaps consider doing a podcast where they’re interviewing someone.
I think those are some of the good opportunities that we look at.
Al: Question for you on what you just said. You said McDougall, you guys will approach influencers yourselves when you’re running the said podcasts or some piece of content. How do you convey to the benefit of them participating in whatever you have in mind?
John: Really what it is, is that we’re promoting them in our channel. We approach them and we say, “We’d like to do an interview together, a podcast. We’d like to promote your ideas and discuss them with our clients and the people that we deal with through our own marketing.” I think that it’s more about how we can help them and that usually works.
I don’t think many people turn us down for those sort of interviews because it is easy to do for a short podcast. Also, we’re helping them. We learn a lot from it and they get promoted in either the podcast or also the blog posts, and we perhaps eventually turn them into an eBook.
Al: It’s interesting. I don’t think anybody really turns down an opportunity for them to share their voice on the Internet in any shape or form on their expertise. Especially if you are approaching them and saying, “Hey, we think you’re super great. Would you mind sharing your ideas, thoughts and insights on this podcast for instance and talking about it?”
I don’t think a lot of people would turn something down like that. I’m wondering though, say it’s like if somebody is trying to sell a proprietary product or service and they’re reaching out to an influencer who maybe they’ve never ever talked to before but it’s very well-tuned in the industry.
How would you go about conveying the value to that particular influencer? What do think is in it for them in that situation.
John: It is certainly still good that you’re…It is more about the influencer’s content. It’s less about your own. You’re not having a discussion about your own content or your ideas and concepts. But you are really discussing the concepts of the influencer and you really bring that up. I think if you make that clear, you are much more likely to have people understand the value.
Especially if they’re going to a site which has already built up quite a lot of great content.
That’s another factor. It is a lot easier for us now. We have been running the Legal Marketing Review for a while now. We can just point to those interviews and say, “This is what other people have been doing,” and also list the type of influencers that had been in those podcasts. It makes it very easy for people to see that we’re really trying to learn from the industry and give that knowledge back to the industry
Al: I think you’re right. Giving context by sharing one’s past examples is good. It’s a good way to get the influencer bought in, so to say. It’s interesting that you mentioned the blogger relations before. Before I was at HubSpot, I worked at a marketing agency where one of our clients they sold…they still might be in business, but it was like an online website where girls could customize their own clothes online and buy them.
The person who would purchase these for the kids would be the parents. We’d want to influence the parents, which were typically moms.
What we did was we did a mommy blogger campaign where we reached out to very prominent mommy bloggers. It was basically an email outreach at that time. We didn’t have any established relationships with them. Sort of like a cold email to them saying, “Hey, we have this really cool product coming up for the holiday season.
If you would write a review and try it out on your site, we’ll give you a gift card so you could buy some for your children as well.”
But that was Influencer Marketing when it was first starting out, the blogger relations during the day. It almost felt like, a little bit of a cold call, in a way, in terms of Influencer Marketing. But I think it definitely changed today with the ways you could reach out via social media. You could Tweet at somebody, get in touch via LinkedIn introductions or stuff like that.
John: Yeah, it’s a lot easier in some ways – sending an email, it’s probably going to go in the spam folder. It’s better to Tweet somebody, even if you don’t know them and say, “Hey, would like to do an interview?” then you’re probably going to DM if you’re on Twitter or something and then follow up from there.
It is much more likely to happen.
Al: I remember we reached out to about 20 to 30 mommy bloggers and a couple got back. I would sign all the email signatures at the end of this canned email. I would send out Al, just my name, but for some reason, I guess because it was the line of business, they just assumed I was a girl.
When they would write back to me they would talk in the context of me being a girl and they…one of them even called me Ally or something. I was like I am not going to even correct it. I will just keep on going. [laughs]
Who should you target as an influencer?
John: That’s funny. Next question, who should you target as an influencer?
Al: Good question. It’s one of those things that you really need to sit down and make sure that your whole marketing plan is mapped out in your whole strategy. Think of who your audience is. Either what you’re trying to sell, promote, convey via your marketing. And then think of who are the thought leaders or the people in this space that have quite a large following that would be interested in promoting this messaging in a unique way through their content.
I think you need to just take a step back and think about what you are trying to promote and sell and say, “OK, who talks about this frequently?” or “who posts about or produces content about it?”
John: That makes absolute sense. It reminds me of a couple of case studies. USA is a good example of one that focuses on military bloggers and they reach out to people. We just did a podcast this last week which is not published yet but it was with Jim Cahill who’s an amazing blogger, been doing blogging for 10 years at Emerson Process Management.
They are a multi-billion-dollar company. He started off by focusing on the journalists that had blogs in his trade industry and ended up helping to spark off the entire blogging industry in his particular field. It is sort of the conduit for the community.
That is one thing that I think about, which is, social can be so broad. It can take up so much time. I think it can be very overwhelming to people. When I think of who you should target for an influencer, part of it should be also thinking about the resources that you have and what you are capable of doing.
If there is an opportunity to target a very large group of people, then maybe narrow it down so that you are actually capable of doing something within the scheme of things because, I think, sometimes social media can be just too overwhelming for people.
Al: Exactly. Sometimes you might pick an influencer and the message might fall on deaf ears. You really got take a look who their audience is and if their following is legitimate to that as well. Some people, they could have large followings, but are you sure that that following is part of your audience, or it’s the right type of person you are targeting?
While a big number of followers or connections or something of this influencer might look very attractive, I think it also warrants a critical look into if this audience is actually going to resonate with this message.
John: At HubSpot in partner marketing, how do you target influencers and leverage some of the relationships that you have for getting the word out?
Al: There’s definitely a couple of ways that we could define Influencer Marketing through the way we do partner marketing at HubSpot. To broaden that topic a little bit, there are two ways we run the partner business. One is we bring on new partners. We create content around agency specific content. Building retainers, selling new business, branding, stuff that agencies are interested in, and then connect it to Inbound Marketing, so they become a new agency partner.
Then there is the other side of partner marketing that we do – that when our new agencies become partners, we work with them to drive more business for them. It’s sort of a two-pronged approach, one, we are bringing in new agency partners, and two, we are helping our existing agency partners generate more business.
On the first part where we are trying to bring on new agency partners, our influencers in the space are basically people from the big agencies around the world. People who have been in it for a while, understand what it takes to grow an agency, building retainer business, even merging with other agencies to grow your agency or sell the business as well.
Those are like thought leaders because that’s what taps in with the prospects that we are trying to attract to the partner program. Those thought leaders in the agency space.
John: What’s the mechanism you use for targeting particular agencies and how the whole content process works with your program there?
Al: It comes in all flavors too, in that regard. At our annual conference, Inbound, that we have in Boston, we have a lot of speaking sessions from those types of influencers out there, like Brent Hodgins is one I can name, David Baker. Well known people in the agency world that will come to our conference and speak, because that’s sort of a way we’ll get agency prospects interested in other partner programs just by basically having those influencer speak at our conferences.
Contributions from Influencers & Social Content
John: That leads me to our next question. What are the best ways to make social content by asking for contributions from influencers?
Al: Good question. The best ways to make social content is that in the way of saying how do I make the content in‑house that then an influencer will promote. Or how do I make that content with the influencer, it’s like a mutual effort.
John: Making the content with the influencer is a mutual effort. For example, Toby Bloomberg who’s a colleague of mine down in Atlanta. She has for many years been with the American Marketing Association and has run the forum for the AMA on interactive marketing, and a well-known blogger. She and I, a couple of years ago, wrote this post together where we interviewed 35+ influencers or agency people on the issue of agency transparency for content for social media.
We wrote this horrendous post but it had a huge impact in the industry at the time. It was a bit bad, but it was a lot of fun to put together. It took about a month or two for us to get all the answers back and then correlate everything and then come back with the opinions, which were for and against. There was a definitely a lot of debate in the industry after that post.
Al: Some of the best ways are obviously to make it easy for the influencer to contribute while maximizing what they put into the piece of content itself. Their time is valuable and you want to make sure that you are optimizing it as much as possible. If you are putting together an eBook and you want to co‑author it with an influencer, it might make sense to figure out a way that you could do that without taking away several hours from their time to do it, whatever that may be.
Maybe they write the intro of the eBook or something, or they help approve of some of the social messages that you push out. I think asking for less is a lot more in this type of situation.
John: Yeah that makes a lot of sense. There have been a couple of good examples that I can think of recently. There was one in the SEO industry where 20 or 30 people were asked one or two questions about “how do you build good link bait?”. The answers were quite amazing. The other thing I think of is Chris Brogan, remember that example a couple of years ago when he did the Twebinar with Radian6 and the video?
I think it shut down Twitter at the time. [laughs] That was a great example of where Radian6 built a relationship with Chris Brogan as a celebrity blogger and he goes out there, he gets all that content, and he puts out this piece that not only projected and put Radian6 in the marketplace but it also helped Chris as well at the time…That was a great event I recall.
Al: There are a couple that you could probably reflect on too, whether it’s thought leaders in the marketing space that have partnered with a software company, or something that’s launching something new. Radian6 is your example here, where they have taken somebody who knows a lot in the space and ensure best practices, and then will tie it back to whatever they are trying to promote or market.
That’s Influencer Marketing gold right there, if you can make it work very well.
John: I like your case study in the channel marketing. My background started over 20 years ago in channel marketing, so I’ve got a soft spot for that as well as being a VAR and of course working at agencies and here at McDougall over the years as well. It’s interesting to hear about your model for partnering with your partners, for working with the partners and how you help them to get the word out about their great content.
Al: Yes. That’s another thing that we do here too, as well. That second part of the partner marketing model I was talking about before is we help our partners generate more traffic, visitors and leads; so we have initiatives around that, whether it be through social sharing, or through having them guest blog on HubSpot. It’s like an inverse way of looking at Influencer Marketing.
We are sort of the influencer for them in this case, where they tap into our reach and our channels to generate more leads and business. Everybody wins in this case because more business for them is more business for us, and it’s a mutual relationship.
John: Right, it’s just great. How should we track results from Influencer Marketing?
Al: Good question, it’s the last one, it’s probably the hardest one to answer because right now there is no real easy way to track it effectively. There are some tips that I can share if you are thinking about running an Influencer Marketing campaign.
One thing that comes to mind is whatever that piece of content that the influencer is sharing, whether it be a downloadable eBook or a webinar that they would be attending with the influencer as a panelist on it – figure out a way to set up some link tracking or conversion tracking on people who are taking part in that.
You could always tie it back to that influencer’s marketing efforts on your behalf. If it’s a webinar signup or an eBook download, ensure that if they are promoting it to their channels or they have somebody on their team promoting to their channels, that they get a specific trackable link that you can then track back to whatever conversion analysis you’re doing. That is the more technical approach to tracking the effect as well.
John: We talked about this before, which is, there is a way of – maybe especially within SalesForce — to actually identify who the influencer is and what URLs they’re using. Then mapping those within SalesForce so that if you get any traffic from those particular URLs from other people, obviously not the influencer, then you can track that ongoing relationship with the influencer or any engagement that you are doing with the influencer over time.
There are ways to track that. It’s a little bit more complicated to set up, but I think there are definitely ways to do it.
Al: You could set up UTM codes in the URL for instance, that track into, as you mentioned, SalesForce or any CRM using campaigns so that you can see that on the backend and show ROI for your efforts. I’m sure for folks listening in, if you are thinking about Influencer Marketing campaign as a part of the overall campaign that you are running, you are going to want to see “did that influencer actually make an impact on the bottom line?”.
This is where segmenting out different channels such as the influencer, if you are doing an email campaign alongside it or other social promotion on your own social channels, you want to be able to differentiate between that to see if it actually makes an impact against your other marketing efforts.
John: I think that’s definitely a great way to do it. Especially if you’ve got an easy relationship where it’s possible to give a link that is trackable, but I think there are also circumstances where it’s not always appropriate to give that trackable link. An influencer comes along just because of their relationship with you over time and they grab a link and put it into their blog post or website or something.
Al: We love it when that happens but then we can’t track it. [laughs]
John: Exactly, it’s untrackable. But that’s where you can use marketing automation to identify those influencers and those long term relationships with them, that engagement strategy that you are using, and identify which URLs they are using, either Twitter or Facebook or whatever it is. They have Twitter, or a website or something, and any traffic that came from those URLs we want to track.
We also want to correspond that with the level of outreach that we do with that particular influencer.
Al: Totally agree.
John: This has been a really good discussion, Al. I really appreciate the opportunity to talk about these issues today.
Al: It was great to be here, thanks for having me.
John: Tell us how people can get in touch with you?
Al: My Twitter handle, it’s kind of hard to spell my last name but I am sure we can put a link in wherever this podcast is eventually embedded. [Editor: @albiedrzycki] It will be up on Twitter. I’m very active on there. I respond to tweets. Make sure you follow me, I’ll follow you back.
Find me on LinkedIn and within the HubSpot community as well. We just launched something called inbound.org which is an inbound marketing community. Be sure to check that out. I’m active on those forums as well.
John: That’s great, Al. Thanks very much for joining me today.
Al: Likewise, John.
John: Check out workingdemosite.com/authority for more interviews and information on Authority Marketing and subscribe to the podcast on iTunes. I’m John Cass, see you next time on the Authority Marketing Roadmap.
Jim Cahill on Corporate Blogging and Community Monitoring
John Cass: Hi, I’m John Cass and welcome to the Authority Marketing Roadmap. I’m here with John McDougall and today we’re going to be interviewing our guest, who is Jim Cahill, chief blogger and head of social marketing for Emerson Process Management in Austin, Texas. The Emerson Process Experts blog was named BtoB magazine’s Best Blog for 2010. Welcome Jim.
Jim Cahill: Thank you very much for having me John and John.
John: We’ve known one another for actually almost 10 years because I believe that you got involved maybe in the corporate blogging survey I did 10 years ago and certainly the blogging success survey that I did eight years ago. I really appreciate the work that you did then with me for great case studies. Perhaps you could go a little bit into your back story at Emerson. How did you come to do blogging there?
Blogging at Emerson
Jim: The story goes back probably into the early ’90s. I was part of our systems business. We basically make control systems that control industrial processes, stuff that blows through pipes, so think of refineries and petrochemical plants and pharmaceuticals and all of these different types of production facilities.
We ended up joining in with another business unit that provided services to put in these control systems and measurement devices and all sorts of things. I was the marketing communications manager for the systems business.
I had a challenge of “how do I talk about our people and their expertise and everything?” At that time, in the ’90s, blogs were starting to become out there and they were nice in that you could tell stories, use more of a natural voice, as opposed to a very marketing-speak voice that we were using at the time.
That was the initial foray. I started an Emerson Process Experts blog and I’m still doing it to this day. The charter is really to tell stories about the experts that we have across our business units and the things they are doing working with our technologies and their expertise to help solve problems for our customers.
John: I also recall, were you not also building an influencer program with some of the journalists in the industry as well? Did that blog help with that process?
Jim: Yes, very much so because at the time and even today, it’s a smaller circle of people that talk about things like these, control systems and automating these plants and everything about it. Obviously, members of the trade press looking at it from an industry perspective or a technology perspective and area, and me as a blogger.
So, I would follow the things they were writing about, they would follow what I was writing about, and it would open up opportunities. As I talked about some of our experts, it would fit into some of the stories they were working on. It gave us a chance to build thought leadership in very specific areas that we had expertise.
John: How successful has the program been?
Jim: Very, and in quite a number of areas we’re seen as the industry leader. It’s interesting, what it did back then still works today. In fact, yesterday one of our people that’s very steeped in the knowledge of nanotechnology and how it’s being applied in our space, we did a post yesterday in 15 minutes.
An editor out of the United Kingdom sent me an email and said “Hey, I’m working on a story for an issue later in the spring. I just saw this in my RSS feed. Can I talk to your expert, build out the story a little bit more?” It continues to work.
The blog is now eight years old and what it’s done is built these relationships where it’s not just through my blog anymore, it’s that the people in the various areas of the trade press know who our experts are and go to them directly through LinkedIn, through email, through whatever else, and then we work it from there. It’s been very successful for us.
Community Monitoring and Marketing
John: I remember that you told me that you’d learned a lot from monitoring the community. How does listening affect your knowledge of what’s happening in the community and why do you think that’s helpful in being a marketer?
Jim: Listening is fundamental for me in getting ideas of things to talk about from the blog. But more and more as you look at what’s become available over the last couple years, primarily LinkedIn for us. I strongly encourage our experts to make sure they are in LinkedIn, that their profile’s very professional.
That they use their LinkedIn status to share interesting articles they come across, “link in” with different people there, join a couple key groups in their area of specialization. And use it as their communications tool, to reach the people who are interested in what they have to say.
What started out as me and the blog, and then other people who were doing that, now spread out through communities and very broadly things like very specialized LinkedIn groups and other areas.
Blogging and Lead Generation
John: That’s interesting. I remember you had said that the blog generates leads. Does it still do that, and how do they come in, and how has the lead flow changed over the years?
Jim: Yeah, it’s still a big source of what we have. But now, as we look across our total social landscape, people find different blog posts through Google searches and other things. Or they may ask a question on a Facebook group that we have, on one of our brands or something else.
If you look at the total landscape, we have different people making inquiries, which many turn into sales leads. We’re a very complex business with different sales channels and everything else. We really have a clearing house group that, for my blog, I can feed in inquiries from Facebook.
We have a team of people that are listening that can feed in inquiries. They get it into the hands of the right sales organization to act upon that and then go back and close the loop and see, “was contact made? Is it in the sales process?” From when we talked last, it’s gotten more sophisticated with a lot more infrastructure around it.
John: Is that infrastructure in such a way where you’re only looking at channels that the company has, or are you looking beyond that way, you’re doing searches? How does that work? Is it just on the company channels…
Jim: We are looking on the company channels. Also, we have social relationship management software where we’re looking at key terms going on. For instance, when you’re in the world of process automation, energy-efficiency is a big deal. We are looking at various terms around that, who is talking about it, where, tradecrafts or competition, other people.
We’re monitoring those kind of things, looking for opportunities to intersect some of our experts into the conversation or identify sales opportunities or local sales people to pursue. That whole aspect of listening and listening beyond our brands and our properties is a big thing.
John: Why do you think the program has been so successful over the years?
Jim: I think it’s just a natural outgrowth. If you look at marketing in general, it’s turning so digital from even 10 years ago. If you looked at the marketing and the communications mix, a lot of it was very print specific and other things. That’s moved to digital and social, just that extension of it.
The thing it does very well that seems better than anything else is shrinking that distance between the people with the expertise and the people seeking expertise. The more we get our experts out, whether it’s through blog posts, or LinkedIn participation in the various areas, or whatever else, we’re shrinking that distance and helping our sales process by identifying these opportunities and getting them into our sales process.
John: How does an expert get into the program? Is it the situation where somebody comes to you and says “Hey, I want to be an expert. Can you put in your program and start helping me?” Or do you go to people in the company? How does the whole process work?
Jim: We have experts in every area. I think it’s more selling the idea, getting their knowledge out there, and making it more findable benefits them in many ways. One, if their services are billable, if they’re a consultant, using these channels, getting their expertise out there markets their capabilities a lot better and opens up those opportunities. Some people recognize that building their personal brand, that’s important.
Then, other things. Some people are just not as comfortable doing it. Having conduits like me through my blog or other people through some of the communities we participate in, it’s almost like having someone that is comfortable as a hub, and spokes out to these experts that are less comfortable with doing it directly.
We’ve tried different things over the years, tried to find things, but overall grow the footprint of our experts out there.
Gaining Authority in the General Marketing Industry
John: Can you bring me up to date where you are with the community? Because I often think of you gaining authority in the community by constantly supporting the community. What would you recommend to your colleagues in the general marketing industry if they were starting out in social and community? How would they gain authority?
Jim: First, I would say don’t underestimate the difficulty in getting one started. They’re scattered, they’re far‑flung, they’re all over the place. Communities sprout up in different areas, like LinkedIn groups I consider a community around some kind of topic, or even a Facebook page or something else.
What we did personally was, about three years ago – we have annual customer events. It’s all about knowledge‑sharing, bringing together over 3,000 people, a lot of customers, a lot of our subject matter experts, all together for a one week event out of the year.
We thought it would be a good idea if we extended that. Instead of just knowledge‑sharing around all these technologies, we have one week out of the year to start an online community, branded the same as the event. That way, it’s 24/7, it’s global. That’s been going three years now. It has started to take off in many areas.
If I were offering advice, one of the most difficult types of communities to get going is a peer-to-peer knowledge-sharing community. A support community is a much easier thing, because if you say, “This is an area we have experts ready to contribute,” you can do that.
When it’s more of a peer-to-peer sharing, it’s much more voluntary. It just takes more time and patience to build up and get going.
John: That reminds me of Amy Jo Kim’s book, “Building Online Community,” from 2001, I think [Editor: “Community Building on the Web : Secret Strategies for Successful Online Communities,” Amy Jo Kim, Peachpit Press, 2000]. There was a great example in there of the process of building an online community from newbie to elder and so forth. Do you use some of those, maybe not the same techniques or strategies, but do you use something similar in helping new people in and keeping the conversation going?
Jim: Yeah. We have a dedicated community manager, and then across our various business units we have some focal points in there. Part of the role of the community manager is welcoming in new people, it’s applauding the people that are participating. We recognize them at the event, some of our top people who participate.
Just as it reaches critical mass, we make sure that, as people are providing answers, to recognize them, thank them very much for doing that. In other areas of the community, maybe where things aren’t going as much, we’re encouraging our subject matter experts to participate by sharing some of the things that they’re talking about with customers and problems they’re solving.
All that takes people and some energy to get people in there and contributing to it, but it’s a great thing. Once it reaches critical mass and people are naturally asking and answering questions, it’s a great thing.
John: Yeah, priming the pump. Then, once you’ve got the community to the right level, it’s amazing once they start to tumble along without you having to be there, in a way.
Impacts on SEO & Social
John McDougall: Jim, this is John McDougall. I’m curious, one, if you’re working systematically on SEO, or if that’s just happened naturally because of all the great content. Or are you very specific about picking key words and a lot of that essential SEO stuff that sometimes bloggers do and sometimes they don’t?
What is the influence, have you seen a relationship, because you’re doing so great with blogging, not only has that lifted your SEO ranks, but is there some impact that you’ve seen, by having community and so much social, on your SEO specifically?
Jim: Yeah. I know we’ve got very formal programs around SEO on our website, on making sure they’re as optimized as they can be. From a social standpoint, I’m more looking at it to see “what were the most popular things I’ve been talking about?”.
I’ll go back periodically and look in the analytics and see what were the areas most popular, to use that to guide some of the content in the future. But I don’t do as much about trying to make sure I get these words into the title, into the first, you know, some of the other things, because I just want it to be more natural.
I more think about it in, especially in our industry, we’ve got a lot of people that are reaching the retirement age, a lot of Boomers out there, Millennials coming in to fill their place. So I think about, content-wise, what can I do that’s educational for some of the newer folks that are coming in?
Because the feedback I get and the people that most respond to me seem to be the people coming up to speed with all that. I don’t think about specific words and all that for it.
I just think about, more content-wise, what would I think is valuable to someone coming in learning the ranks, and make sure I’m linking to the educational stuff that we have across our digital space, from communities to websites to different blog posts, or in other areas, Wikipedia and other things. That seems to have worked pretty well over the years for us.
Sharing Blog Posts
John McDougall: Do you have a process when you submit a blog post, when you post it, for reaching out to certain communities and sharing it?
Jim: We have a number of things that are automated. There’s some automated, some manual. What I’ll typically do is, when I do a post, it goes into our community based on the way I’ve categorized it or tagged it. We’ve got a very big community.
If it’s something specific, say like today’s post, “Distillation Column Control,” – based on the way I tagged it, it goes in, an excerpt of it, into that part of the community. Our social relationship management, we schedule it so that a short blurb about it goes into Facebook, into my Twitter feed, into Google Plus, some of the other things in there.
Then, the thing that’s more manual, based on who the subject matter expert I was talking about, I say “Hey,” send him an email, “It’s live. I encourage you and your peers in your group, share this in your LinkedIn status because you’re all connected to our customers, to other people.”
By the time all those, you add them up, a single blog post and then all these other areas, I counted it up for a couple; it may reach 20,000 potential people that may have seen it. Not all click through to the page, but just in a total space. That happens with each post that goes out.
Posting Frequency
John McDougall: What about maybe just a quick tip on thinking, way back when you first got started blogging because I think some of the people listening might not have a whole community set up and be at that level yet. Were you posting blogs every single day when you started? How much are you posting now? Any quick thoughts for corporate blogging, specifically how people can get started?
Jim: When I started the goal back then, because I was half marketing communications manager, half blogger trying to promote our experts in the business there, I was doing it two to three times a week. Now, in a role — I’m leading our efforts across our business units and world areas around social marketing, I’m blogging. I try to do one post a day, every day during the week.
If I was recommending to someone getting started, I’ve seen some reach a reasonable level of success even in every other week. You’re never at great success when you’re on that kind of frequency. I’ve seen some of our technology folks be successful with a once a week blog.
It’s based on what you’re trying to do. In my case, I’m trying to make visible as many of our experts and their expertise and get that out there. I hate to miss a day because the blog’s been around a long time and managed to build up a pretty good audience of folks.
John McDougall: Is this a big part of your marketing now overall as a company?
Jim: It used to be thought of as an island that was out there. Now, it’s getting much more integrated with everything else. As we look about – if there are some key business focus areas, and we have communications plans and campaigns falling out of it, social is very much part of that.
We tried to set up tracking around it. Let’s say we have a series of webinars for onshore oil and gas production. We want to be able to see, “what were the contributions through the emails that were sent out about the event to get people to come, what about through the blog, the various social channels?”
We’re much more sophisticated in the way that we can track, based around campaigns and other things. Yet, there’s still, in there, a bit of a free flow based on the subject, what’s going on, what we’re finding through the listening posts there. I would say it’s much more integrated than it was before, yet there is still flexibility and free-flow based on what we’re listening to and what we find out.
John: Great. Jim, it’s been great to spend a couple of minutes with you again to go over these things. It was great to speak with you again, Jim.
Jim: It’s always a pleasure to catch up with you, John. I really enjoyed our conversation.
John: Tell us how people can get in touch with you.
Jim: I would say that you can either look at my blog which is Emerson Process Experts, or if you Google Jim Cahill, I think my top one is LinkedIn, search result on that. Google Jim Cahill, “link in” with me, and that’s a great start.
John: Great, and check out workingdemosite.com/authority for more interviews and information on Authority Marketing. Subscribe to the podcast on iTunes. I’m John Cass, and also here with John McDougall. See you next time on the Authority Marketing Roadmap.
- « Previous Page
- 1
- …
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- …
- 30
- Next Page »